Clarifying user request
It seems beneficial to ask the user for clarification: “Do you want a summary, background, or a link to the source?” Since they posted a headline, they might be looking for the article or more context. The instructions suggest I should be concise and only ask when necessary, but this request isn’t clear. I can provide a possible summary: If this is the headline, I can mention issues surrounding Barcelona and compensation after a match against Eintracht Frankfurt, referencing a known incident from April 2022.Asking for clarification
It seems like a good idea to ask the user for clarification. I could say something like, “Do you want me to find the original report and summarize it, or do you just want a brief overview?” I can offer options like pulling the source and translating key points, including the incident timeline, compensation details, and possible disciplinary actions by UEFA or LaLiga. I should respond in Chinese and provide a neutral summary. Also, I need to ask if they want me to fetch the source link for verification.
这是新闻标题对吧？你希望我：
- 找到原报道并用要点式总结/翻译关键细节，还是
- 基于现有信息做个简短背景解读？
如果不查源，简要解读如下：
- 事件：法兰克福球迷在诺坎普引发骚乱（通常涉及看台秩序、安保冲突或设施受损）。
- 巴萨诉求：经济赔偿多半涵盖设施损坏、安保与清洁额外成本、可能的运营损失；同时会配合警方追责个体肇事者。
- 程序走向：等待警方与安保公司报告；西甲/欧足联层面可能有纪律程序与罚款；俱乐部之间也可能就赔偿与票务管理复盘。
- 关注点：赔偿主体（俱乐部、赛事组织方或个人肇事者）、证据链、赛事方的安保预案是否存在瑕疵。
需要我现在检索原文并给你核实后的要点和来源链接吗？